Saturday 13 April 2024

Planning Section Chief Course Review - 02 April to 05 April 2024

Emerson Lake, High River, AB (photo by V.A. McMillan, 2023)

 

Title: Planning Section Chief Course Review – 02 April to 05 April 2024

 

The Town of High River with the High River Fire Department hosted the Planning Section Chief course delivered by Daryl Black of Exigent Academy (https://www.exigentinc.ca/43055/academy/). The program was delivered at the Memorial Centre in High River, Alberta between the 2nd and the 5th of April 2024. The Alberta Emergency Management Agency was also present to ensure their endorsement was not misplaced. The program had other ICS role specific training – Incident Commanders, Operations Section Chiefs, Logistics Section Chiefs, and Task Force Leaders/Strike Team Leaders. In all, over 100-students received exceptional training in their specialty.  

For many who take ICS (Incident Command System) training, there is little opportunity for enhanced training beyond the ICS-100, ICS-200, ICS-300, and ICS-400 courses. Thankfully, organizations like Exigent Academy are stepping in to fill this knowledge gap. The first operational period should NOT be the place where you learn about the role you need to fulfil. Daryl Black and his team of instructors did a fantastic job of sharing their personal experiences and knowledge of ICS and incident management. I did not encounter any student who expressed any displeasure with their learning experience. Kudos, Daryl!

This training event was hosted in the Memorial Centre in downtown High River. A fitting venue, since some of the case studies discussed included the 2013 Southern Alberta Floods, which flowed down streets right close to the Memorial Centre. Not only was the training excellent, the catering service for the provided lunches throughout the week was also excellent. Easier to learn when you are in an appropriate facility and eating great food during the lunch break…good food fuels learning well.

So, what did it cost, you ask??? Each role specific training cost $875 and that included access to digital student manuals and the catered lunches. In my biased opinion, it was a good value. For those considering getting onboard for the next training opportunity, just know that ICS-300 is a pre-requisite.

Until next time…Get some training!

VAM.





Friday 1 December 2023

Bridging The Gap - Connecting Resilient Housing Research with Informed Buyer's Behaviour

Iceland Mountain & Mist (photo by V.A. McMillan, October 2023)

 

Today, I will share an article initially written to be submitted to the Canadian Journal of Emergency Management (CJEM). It was a very valuable experience, especially as my scholastic phase was coming to an end; to experience writing, submitting, editing, and waiting for the article to be reviewed and either accepted or not. Unfortunately, for my first attempt, my article did not achieve the required standard to be published in CJEM. While, I would have been honoured to be published on the first try; it was going through the process to be published that was a very valuable experience. One day in the future, when I have the time on my hands, I will craft future articles and hopefully, I will get published. Thankfully, I have my blogs to publish my works to share with others. 

I have made a couple edits to the submitted draft article. However, even these edits would have been unlikely to have changed the selection process, but they will make this post more complete. Enjoy.

Bridging Gaps – Encouraging Citizen Participation in Requesting Disaster Resilient Structures that Meet FEMA, IBHS, ICLR, & IBC Recommendations 


V. Andrew McMillan

Justice Institute of British Columbia

For

Canadian Journal of Emergency Management

Due Date: January 2023


Bridging Gaps – Encouraging Citizen Participation in Requesting Disaster Resilient Structures that Meet Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS), Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction (ICLR), & Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC) Recommendations  

The quintessential question in home structures has always been why don’t homeowners, building owners, and residential renters request structures that are designed and constructed disaster resilient? As end-users of these accommodation structures, should they not have a voice to demand structures that do not fail when disaster strikes? Many emergency management practitioners and academics are familiar with the engineered solutions from organizations like the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS), the Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction (ICLR), and the Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC). This paper will contribute to the greater discussion of bridging structural disaster resilient housing solutions for “disaster proofing” housing. 

Defining the Problem

With increasing severity and frequency of disaster events (United Nations, 2015), the need for structural disaster resiliency should be self-evident. Four of the seven targets identified on UN DRR website (https://www.undrr.org/implementing-sendai-framework/what-sendai-framework) are: reduce disaster mortality, reduce the number of impacted persons, reduce direct economic loss, and reduce disaster damage to critical infrastructure and basic services. All these targets are positively impacted if disaster resilient structures were the norm, rather than the exception. If the structures where people live, work, or learn are not destroyed by disaster events, fewer people would be injured or killed, recovery time from disasters would be reduced, and economic loss would be minimized. 

FEMA expressed concern that the transfer of knowledge, like solutions to disaster resilient structures, are trapped in research and agency silos and not reaching all audiences (FEMA, 2018)). In addition, agencies supported by the insurance industry, may be missing the opportunity to practice preventative strategies when solutions for designing and constructing resilient structures are not known by home or building owners. The key is to include all stakeholders in defining the problem, for without input from all impacted parties there might be gaps in the solutions devised. See Figure 1 for a Venn diagram of the interconnectedness of stakeholders and the location of the solution zone. 

Figure 1 Stakeholders & Systems

Disasters of the greatest impact to resilient housing structures result from a ‘quadruple threat’ created by wildfires, floods, earthquakes, and severe wind events (McMillan, 2022). The priority is to develop disaster resilient structures that are specifically designed, constructed, and operated to defeat a quadruple threat’s impact on the end-user, as this will ensure a higher survival rate for people and their homes when disaster strikes their community. 

Solutions 

The solutions required to design, construct, and operate disaster resilient homes and other structures in the quadruple threat environment (wildfires, floods, earthquakes, and wind events) span multiple sources (McMillan, 2022). IBHS, ICLR, and IBC share solutions to multiple specific threat vectors developed from their individual research labs. Other sources, like FireSmart (Canada) and FireWise (USA) are focused on wildfire mitigation tactics homeowners can employ to minimize the impacts caused by wildfires. FireSmart targets individual owners, while Firewise targets entire neighbourhoods and communities. The Federal Alliance for Safe Homes (FLASH) targets the end-user and have developed a buyer’s guide for resilient homes to positively influence buying habits (2021). Other findings can be summed up for the roofing system, wall and floor system, foundation system and the water management (drainage) system. Solutions for the roofing system are most numerous as the roof is one of the critical systems of a disaster-proofed structure. The hip-styled roof profile enhances aerodynamics and ensures wind resistance (FEMA, 2013; Ginger et al., 2021). A steep pitched roof, 3/12 for water drainage, 4/12 for snow shedding, and 6/12 for hurricane resistance, is recommended for water and wind events (Deltec, 2020; FEMA, 2011). Fireproofed roofs require construction with non-combustible materials while using lightweight material can provide some protection from injuries from earthquakes (Colorado Springs Fire Department (CSFD), 2022; Syphard et al., 2017; ICLR, 2016). Universally, the use of complex roof designs, including skylights, is strongly discouraged as they can be the weakest component of a roofing system to the quadruple threat of fire, water, quakes, and wind disaster elements (FEMA, 2006). 

Moving from the roofing system, the wall and floor system are substantially strengthened when continuous loading is achieved from roof to foundation (Deltec, 2020; FEMA, 2011). Achieving this requires using hurricane straps and hangers to connect trusses to the walls, connecting floor joist hangers to beams, and bolting sill plates to the concrete foundation (Deltec, 2020). Both fire and hurricane shutters rated appropriately can contribute to defending a structure from disaster by covering openings, while preventing firebrands and embers from infiltrating (FEMA, 2013; ICLR 2012/2018). Exterior siding should be constructed from non-combustible, impact resistant materials to offer maximum protection from heat or flame and wind hurled projectiles (FEMA, 2021, Quarles et al., 2010). 

The structural finding for the foundation system focuses mainly on earthquake and flood resilience. The addition of rubber crumb from recycled automotive tires to the concrete poured for footings and foundation can increase the foundation’s capacity to absorb motion (Chiaro et al., 2019). Similarly, structures built in the flood plain would greatly benefit from foundation systems that exclude the use of a basement (Boughton et al., 2017). Alternatively, the use of permanent elevated foundation or amphibious foundations, to get homes above the planned flood level, offer options for structures built in hurricane country (English et al., 2021; FEMA, 2011; Piatek & Wojnowska-Heciak, 2020). 

Finally, the water management system incorporates ideas to get water from the roof and dispersed away from the foundation or footings, as well as to prevent backup of sewage into the structure. This includes keeping roof gutters and downspouts free and clear of debris to prevent water backup inundating the structure in unplanned locations (IBC, 2016). Water falling from the sky or flowing overland are not the only flooding hazards to prepare for. When urban storm water systems are shared with wastewater systems, the opportunity for extreme back pressure is increased during flooding events. The homeowner has a couple of options to combat this threat. First is to ensure a properly sized and operational backflow valve is installed between the home’s sewer line and the city’s sewer system (ICLR, n.d.). This will prevent sewage from being forced into the lowest levels of a home, as the valve only allows movement in one direction, away from the home. The next item is to install a proper sized and functioning sump pump in the lowest level of the structure (IBC, 2016). The one caveat is to ensure the discharge from the sump pump is not re-entering the structure in another location. 

Figure 2 depicts over three dozen solutions that can be adopted at the design stage to improve structural disaster resilience and many of these solutions can be adopted and retrofitted into existing structures to enhance their structural disaster resiliency. 

Figure 2 Infographic -- Solutions (See Appendix for Details)


While some solutions such as fire and wind mitigation solutions are universally beneficial, the infographic is colour-coded to identify the different threats solutions work to mitigate. Thus, solutions in red mitigates fire risk, solutions in blue mitigate water emergencies, solutions in brown mitigate earthquake damage, and solutions in grey mitigate wind events. Readers can assess and determine which solutions is most relevant to combat hazard threat most common to their location. To make an informed decision, the reader or end-user must be aware of the available strategies to increase structural disaster resiliency, which is the goal of the infographic – collecting and sharing as many solutions as practical. 

An uninformed end-user will continue to accept whatever options are available on the market. To modify this purchasing behaviour to one that demands disaster resilient structures will require open dialogue, education, and factual, objective information. Unfortunately, marketing theory suggests that purchases are often influenced heavily by emotional factors. Therefore, it is highly recommended those with marketing expertise must be invited to the discussion of disaster-resilient home structures. While important to ensure building back better after disasters, but more importantly, building homes that can mitigate damage from disaster events. Thereby, increasing the community’s structural disaster resiliency will greatly aid in reducing fatalities, and those negatively impacted by disasters caused by the quadruple threat, including infrastructure and economic losses. 

References 


Boughton, G.N., Falck, D.J., & Henderson, D.J. (2017). Tool to evaluate the resilience of buildings to severe wind events. In H. Hao & C. Zhang (Eds.), Mechanics of structures and materials: Advancements and challenges (pp. 1887-1892). Taylor & Francis Group.

Chiaro, G., Palermo, A., Granello, G., Hernandez, E., Tasalloti, A., Stratford, C., & Banasiak, L.J. (2019). Enhancing the resilience of low-rise buildings: A New Zealand perspective. Society for Earthquake and Civil Engineering Dynamics. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/17930

Colorado Springs Fire Department (CFSD). (2022). Ignition resistant construction design manual. The City of Colorado Springs. https://www.coswildfireready.org/codes-and-standards#rFblSt

Deltec Homes. (2020, 29 November). Anatomy of hurricane resistant home [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Q_iAOSn8uM

English, E.C., Chen, M., Zarins, R., Patange, P., & Wiser, J.C. (2021). Building resilience through flood risk reduction: The benefits of amphibious foundation retrofits to heritage structures. International Journal Architectural Heritage, 15:7, 976-984. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1695154

Federal Alliance for Safe Homes (FLASH). (2021). Buyer’s guide to resilient homes – How to strengthen your home against natural disasters. https://buyersguidetoresilienthomes.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/9-7-21-Buyers-Guide-to-Resilient-Homes-Final.pdf

Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2006). FEMA 232: Homebuilders’ guide to earthquake resistant design and construction. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_232_homebuilders-guide-to-earthquake-resistant-design_6-2006.pdf

Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2011). FEMA P-55 Vol. II: Coastal construction manual – Principles and practices of planning, siting, designing, constructing, and maintaining residential buildings in coastal areas (4th ed.). https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/risk-management/building-science/publications?name=%22P-55%2C+Coastal+Construction+Manual%3A+Principles+and+Practices+of+Planning%2C+Siting%2C+Designing%2C+Constructing%2C+and+Maintaining+Resi%22

Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2013). Mitigation ideas – A resource for reducing risk to natural hazards. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/fema-mitigation-ideas_02-13-2013.pdf

Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2018). A proposed research agenda for the emergency management higher education community. https://training.fema.gov/hiedu/docs/latest/2018_fema_research_agenda_final-508%20(march%202018).pdf

Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2021). FEMA P-361: Safe rooms for tornadoes and hurricanes – Guidance for community and residential safe rooms (4th ed.). https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_safe-rooms-for-tornadoes-and-hurricanes_p-361.pdf

Ginger, J., Parackall, K., Henderson, D., Wehner, M., Ryu, H., & Edwards, M. (2021). Improving the resilience of existing housing to severe wind events – Final project report. Cyclone Testing Station, James Cook University. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/76921_improvingtheresilienceofexistinghou.pdf

Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction. (n.d.). Focus on backwater valves. Retrieved on, 09 June 2022, from https://www.iclr.org/wp-content/uploads/PDFS/focus-on-backwater-valves.pdf

Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction. (2012/2018). Protect your home from severe wind. https://www.iclr.org/wp-content/uploads/PDFS/ICLR_Severe-wind_2018.pdf

Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction. (2016). ICLR’s QuakeSmart program – Protect your home from earthquakes. https://www.iclr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ICLR_Earthquakes_2016.pdf

Insurance Bureau of Canada. (2016). Water damage – Are you protected? http://assets.ibc.ca/Documents/Brochures/Water-Damage-on-the-Rise.pdf

Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety. (2011, 25 April). IBHS Research Center ember storm test highlights [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvbNOPSYyss

McMillan, V.A. (2022). Houses of straw, sticks, and bricks: Increasing structural disaster resiliency to wildfires, floods, earthquakes, wind events, and the big bad wolf [Unpublished capstone research project]. Justice Institute of British Columbia.

Piatek, L., & Wojnowska-Heciak, M. (2020). Multicase study comparison of different types of flood-resilient buildings (Elevated, amphibious, and floating) at the Vistula River in Warsaw, Poland. Sustainability, 12(22):9725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229725

Quarles, S.L., Valachovic, Y., Nakamura, G.M, Nader, G.A., & De LaSaux, M.J. (2010). Home survival in wildfire-prone areas: Building materials and design considerations. Agriculture and Natural Resources, Publication 8393. https://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/pdf/8393.pdf

Syphard, A.D., Brennan, T.J., & Keeley, J.E. (2017). The importance of building construction materials relative to other factors affecting structure survival during wildfire. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 21(2017), 140-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.11.011

United Nations. (2015, 23 June). Resolution 69/283. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/resolutions/N1516716.pdf


Appendix





Thank you for reading this post.

Here are the links to other school projects I have posted on my blogs:

Research Poster:

https://thegoodplanblog.blogspot.com/2023/08/increasing-structural-disaster.html 


Literature Review from 2019

https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2023/08/beyond-three-little-pigs-creating_29.html


Literature Review from 2022

https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2023/09/houses-of-straw-sticks-bricks.html


Research Proposal from 2022

https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2023/10/the-research-proposal-for-houses-of.html


Capstone Research Project 2022

https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2023/11/capstone-research-project-houses-of.html


Keep studying the world around you!!

V.A.M.








Saturday 26 August 2023

Increasing Structural Disaster Resiliency to Wildfire, Floods, Earthquakes, & Wind Events - A Research Poster

 With school behind me and getting published in a journal elusive, it is now time to start sharing some of my school research with a larger audience, like you!!


I am going to start by sharing my research poster:


My Research Poster from the BESM Program @ the JIBC (c) 2022


I will save any editorials until I have posted all my interesting papers here or on my other blog, I will be sure to share links between both blogs, as I will post different projects on each one.

Remember, go to school, get a good education, and share what you have learned,

VAM.


Update: Next post at Mountainman's Mantra: 

https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2023/08/beyond-three-little-pigs-creating_29.html


Update: Next literature review:

https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2023/09/houses-of-straw-sticks-bricks.html


Update: Research Proposal:

https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2023/10/the-research-proposal-for-houses-of.html


Update: Capstone Research Project:

https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2023/11/capstone-research-project-houses-of.html

Update: Bridging the Gaps Article:

https://thegoodplanblog.blogspot.com/2023/12/bridging-gap-connecting-resilient.html











Friday 20 January 2023

CERT LSAR Table Top Exercise Game Board Concept

Looking West (photo by V.A. McMillan)

 Title: CERT LSAR Table Top Exercise Game Board

 

As mentioned in a recent blog post (https://thegoodplanblog.blogspot.com/2023/01/cert-basics-course-still-time-to.html) I will be instructing the CERT Basics Light Search and Rescue (LSAR) unit for CERT Canada. For other CERT instructors and CERT teams who may be working on setting up or refreshing their LSAR training, I wanted to take this time to share the table top exercise (TTX) game board I have designed. This TTX game board is sized 36” wide x 24” high, and yes, it is laminated. Once seen, I am sure most instructors and team leaders would be able to create a version for themselves that would benefit their students or team. I would expect any renditions would employ a local map in the centre that would be known and of value to the location of the CERT team.

CERT TTX Game Board with Map 1 (Click on image to enlarge)


CERT TTX Game Board with Map 2


This TTX game board can likely be used with almost any TTX scenario used for CERT Basics LSAR or CERT team scenario training. The nine-step SIZE-UP frames the map, so that the team can be talked through the scenario and appropriate comments, decisions, options, resources, etc. can be recorded on the game board. Using fine tipped whiteboard markers the information can be recorded directly to the game board and at the end of the training session a damp cloth can erase the marking and be ready for the next training event.

One benefit, I see of this style of TTX game board is, the CERT student and CERT team members get exposure and repetitive use of the CERT SIZE-UP process. The more this is done, the stronger the understanding of why it is used, and by extension the easier it will be remembered when CERT deploys in response to an actual disaster event.

This is just a quick post to share this training aide and maybe generate some discussion.

Innovation makes training interesting!

VAM


Update: See a generic version of the game board here: https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2023/01/table-top-exercise-ttx-game-board-for.html 






Thursday 19 January 2023

CERT Basics Course, Still Time to Register!

Mountains (photo by V.A. McMillan)

 

Title: CERT Basics Course, Still Time to Register!

 

CERT Canada is running a CERT Basics Course, 27th – 28th of January and concludes on the 4th of February 2023. (See poster below for full details.) Contact CERT Canada to register online (https://www.bridgesoflove.net/events) or by calling the CERT Canada office (403) 649-0087), for more details. (Yes, some content is the same as on Mountainman’s Mantra https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2023/01/not-too-late-to-register-cert-basics.html).

Poster from CERT Canada


Community Emergency Response Training (CERT) is a community level training scheme to ensure prepared citizens are ready to step up during times of emergency or disaster to be neighbours helping neighbours until first responders can arrive and take-over the response. CERT traces its lineage back to the mid-80’s in Southern California. Since then, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has taken the CERT program nationwide in the United States. CERT Canada in endeavouring to spread the program across Canada.

One of the best histories of the development of CERT is written by David M. Simpson (2001) in an article he wrote for the May 2001 issue of the Natural Hazard Review, pages 54 to 63. His article can be found online (https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2001)2:2(54)) or by searching with DOI https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2001)2:2(54). One point that is lamented through this article is the role played by the citizen during the time of disaster from incident start until help arrives. While big governments and little, promote being prepared and self-sufficient for the first 72-hours, the reality is, it could be much longer before help can arrive depending on the nature and extent of the disaster event. The best mitigation for a protracted disaster event has got to be a prepared citizenry. CERT ethos of neighbours helping neighbours, is a great starting point to create a foundational level of training from which to build neighbourhood or community CERT teams on. Equally important in the CERT training scheme is to maintain or enhance training of CERT teams on a regular basis after the initial CERT Basics course. This will be self-directed training from the CERT team, achieved by holding weekly or monthly meetings and training sessions. This can be further enhanced by CERT organizations hosting quarterly, bi-annual, or annual training workshops, exercises, and/or drills. Individuals on the CERT teams may seek to enhance their personal knowledge and skill level by attending targeted training in first aid, the incident command system, or communications. Or individuals may seek training by becoming a member of another organization – volunteer firefighter, volunteer search & rescue, or becoming a member with St. John’s Ambulance. The more skills and knowledge an individual bring to their CERT team, the more resourceful and valuable that CERT team will be to their community.

Speaking of community…community is one aspect of CERT that should be explored a bit more. While traditionally community is seen as the location you live, it can also be the location where you work or where you pray. FEMA has CERT team training focused on workplace CERT teams and for congregations at the respective houses of worship. Community is where you feel a sense of belonging. And an individual can be a member of multiple communities. Be extension then, CERT teams can be in multiple locations and have members specific to one community but not another. And this is okay. In fact, the better the network of CERT teams with shared members, will help ensure success wherever you are when disaster strikes. It would wonderful if every neighbourhood could produce one seven-member CERT team. It would be wonderful if every workplace with more than 50 employees per shift could produce one seven-member CERT team. And it would be wonderful if every house of worship could also produce a seven-member CERT team. To achieve a seven-member CERT team, would mean that citizen responders caught in the disaster event could begin helping their neighbours immediately, not in an hour, not in a day, not in a week. But right now. To achieve this, more folks need to become involved in their community/communities. Community is coming together, working together, learning together.

To this end, CERT Canada is hosting a CERT Basics course and you still have time to register, so you can become trained and help form a CERT team in your community – where you live, where you work, where you pray. Contact CERT Canada to register online (https://www.bridgesoflove.net/events) or by calling the CERT Canada office (403) 649-0087), for more details.

Yes, the rumours are true, I will be there on the 4th of February, instructing the CERT Light Search & Rescue unit. I hope to see you there.

Be part of the solution…Get trained! Form a CERT Team!

VAM


Saturday 29 October 2022

Introduction to Emergency Management in Canada - A Book Review

Looking West of Plateau Mountain (photo by V.A. McMillan)

Time to add a new title to your emergency management library. I have just received my copy of Introduction to Emergency Management in Canada (2023) Editors Chris J. Collins and Darren Blackburn, published by Emond (https://emond.ca/Store/Books/ ). I am still reading it at the moment, and without finishing this volume, I highly recommend this book. First, it has a Canadian spin which is nice in textbooks. Second, many of the authors were my instructors at the Justice Institute of British Columbia. Most importantly, this is a well written book that is formatting for easy reading and finding information. The logic of the chapters works well. Inside the chapters, the format works well, at least for me.

Cover of Introduction to Emergency Management in Canada (2023)


I will write a more thorough review once this semester is finished, and I have time for a deeper read of this excellent book.

So, are you still reading this?? Did you order your copy, yet??

What are you waiting for??

https://emond.ca/Store/Books/Introduction-to-Emergency-Management-in-Canada

That was the link to Emond Publishing.

Emergency preparedness begins with knowledge. Knowledge comes from many sources, like excellent books!!

VAM


 






Monday 5 September 2022

Evacuation Route Evaluation

Approaching the Cardinal River Valley (photo by V.A. McMillan)


Title: Evacuation Route Evaluation

The whole premise of The G.O.O.D. Plan – Get Out Of Dodge (https://thegoodplanblog.blogspot.com/2020/04/the-good-plan-now-available-on-amazon.html)is to evacuate your family and yourself from where you are to a safer location during a crisis or disaster event. In emergency management those responsible for a community try to plan for the mass evacuation of a whole community or portions of the community during disaster events to save the greatest number of people in the shortest amount of time. There are many challenges to effectively achieve a successful evacuation, not the least of which is being at your own home when the event begins. When you are at a familiar starting point, and you have a plan, and you know where you are going, and you have a primary, secondary, & tertiary routes to get there; odds are better that you will arrive at your planned destination. This begins to get murky when more than one variable is new.

For instance, if you are on vacation and are staying in a strange location when a disaster event occurs you will be at a disadvantage if you need to evacuate. As a visitor you are more likely to be at the mercy of the emergency response plan of the community you are staying in, then when you are at home…UNLESS, you do your homework ahead of time and create a GOOD PLAN for when you are on vacation, in addition to your GOOD PLAN you have created when you are at home. In fact, you could create a basic VACATION GOOD PLAN that stays as an appendix to your GOOD PLAN, that only needs to be tweaked for different vacation locations. Then you can take a copy of that appendix with you.

So, let’s talk about evaluating evacuation routes…the process will be the same for your primary GOOD PLAN as it is for any supplemental GOOD PLANS – vacations, business travel, or just going to the city. Today, we will look at four considerations that can impact evacuation route selection – Mode of Transport, Known Hazards, Safe Zone location, and Routes (see mind map).


Evac Route Evaluation - Mind Map


In this discussion we will not address the type of disaster or crisis event that triggers the need to evacuate. I do recognize that certain events will impact evacuation decisions and route selection; however, we will leave that discussion for a different day.

Starting with Mode of Transport will determine which route has the highest probability to get you to your Safe Zone in the available time to ensure a successful evacuation. At the start time if you have a motorized vehicle in good operating condition, adequate fuel, and a competent driver, you have a better than average chance for success to evacuate a rapidly changing disaster event. To increase the chance of success from a pure luck outcome to something more in your own control requires pre-planning. What are the vehicle’s capabilities?? What is the driver’s experience and skill level?? Can the vehicle travel on routes that are not paved?? Can the vehicle ford shallow water?? Does the vehicle contain basic pioneer tools – shovel, axe, saw, and pick?? Does the vehicle have self-recovery ability – spare tire(s), jerry can of fuel, high lift jack, tow straps, winch, and/or come-along?? Does the vehicle have 4x4 or tire chains for driving in snow?? These are just some of the questions one must ask themselves when pre-planning. To be ready to action your GOOD PLAN you need to know the answers. Because those answers help you determine what route options contribute to developing your PRIMARY ROUTE, SECONDARY ROUTE, and your TERTIARY ROUTE. We will return to routes a little later.

Now if you are not expecting to evacuate using a motorized land travel vehicle, things get a bit more complicated. If your Mode of Transport is with an aircraft, you will need access to said craft and the required licensing & skills to operate it safely. Unless the crisis event devolves into a state without law and order, you will need to abide by licensing rules and regulations. Aircraft also add a secondary challenge in that they are quite picky on where they land. So, if air travel is your Mode of Transport you need to know how to operate your craft, where you are going, and the safest route to get there. Unlike a land vehicle, it is unlikely that an aircraft can be refueled in flight from jerry cans, so your route needs to know how far your aircraft can travel on a given load of fuel and where you can refuel enroute to your Safe Zone. I assume that if air travel is your chosen method, you have a safe place to land when you reach your Safe Zone. The obvious advantage to air travel is that few other folks will be using that Mode of Transport. And location that can be reached ONLY by air will be less populated than ones that can be reached via roads or rails. Therefore, depending on the trigger event, isolation could be a life saver!!

If escape is via water using some sort of vessel, you do not have the same challenges as evacuating by air…namely, you do not have to contend with falling out of the sky. That however does not mean that there are no challenges. Vessels need to be appropriate for the body of water they are planned to traverse – inland water ways (rivers, or lakes), coastal waters, or open ocean (blue water). Furthermore, what means of locomotion does the vessel require?? Fueled engines? Wind? Human power – rowing, paddling, or peddling? Motor vessels will require an adequate supply of fuel to move from one location to the next. Wind vessels require sails. And people powered vessels require humans fit enough to row, paddle, or peddle. Of course, you can drift with the currents, but you might not make it to your destination, unless you know ahead of time where the currents will take you. Again, this requires pre-planning and testing your Mode of Transport along your chosen route. While floating vessels do not need to worry about falling from the sky, they do need to be concerned with staying afloat, which means you need at least a primary and secondary method of evacuating unwanted water from inside your vessel. You would also be wise to have a couple methods for patching your hull in the event your vessel bumped into something that can poke a hole in your hull. Those residing in coastal communities may what to consider using a water evacuation instead of trying to go overland with the crowds. Or at the very least become skilled enough to safely operate a vessel in local waters in case overland routes become non-passable.

Next let’s look at Known Hazards, which are locations or conditions that are expected to cause challenges in times of disaster or crisis. For the purpose of this discussion, we will see Known Hazards through Seasons, Obstacles, & Choke Points. Seasons – winter, spring, summer, autumn, can change the traveling conditions of your planned evacuation route. In Northern climates winter is a noticeable challenge – freezing temperatures, frozen water, slippery ice, and deep snow. So, while a route in the summer or early autumn may be passable with a normal passenger vehicle, in winter that same route may require a 4x4 offroad vehicle with chains, winch, and traction devices or it might only be passable with a snowmobile or tracked vehicle. It is incumbent on you to know your local conditions on your routes in all four seasons. Because this in knowable, it is plannable.

While Seasons are mostly consistent, Obstacles can change as the Mode of Transport changes. A mountain pass, which is usually the lowest location to get between mountains in a range can be crossed on foot in most seasons, with minimal extraneous effort. On the other hand, if there is no road over the mountain pass it will be an extreme effort to move a small convoy of vehicles. And winter will not be an option. If you have offroad vehicles like side-by-side quads on tracks or snowmobiles crossing a mountain pass without a road in the winter becomes a possibility. Success being more likely if there are a group of offroad vehicles traveling together to help each other.

Other Obstacles include lakes, rivers, swamps, cliffs, and forests. Thankfully, these Obstacles are mapped and known. If it is known, it can be planned for.

Finally, we have Choke Points, which coincidentally show up at Obstacles. Cliffs that endanger the roads will likely have tunnels or snow sheds to protect them and improve safe passage of vehicles. Rivers and creeks will have bridges over them. Brooks and small streams will pass under roads through culverts. Mountain passes will have snow removal equipment to keep the roads open through the winter. Bridges, tunnels, passes – are all Choke Points!! A Choke Point is a location that has no alternate or bypass route. Choke Points make excellent Control Points, because all traffic on that route is funnelled into the Choke Point and avoiding the Choke Point is not a likely option. Whether the reasons are legitimate or nefarious, those who control a Choke Point hold the power to control the fate of those trying to evacuate. The lone road to a Safe Zone can also be a Choke Point. So, when you are planning your PRIMARY ROUTE, SECONDARY ROUTE, & TERTIARY ROUTE, you need to conduct, at the very least, a map recce to identify ALL the Choke Points and find alternate routes that bypass them. If it is known, it can be planned for.

The Safe Zone is where you plan to go if you must evacuate your primary residence. The Safe Zone can be a bugout location (BOL), a secondary residence, a vacation home or RV lot, or staying with friends and/or family. No matter how well designed and constructed your primary residence may be, there may come a time when you need to evacuate, even for a short duration and in that event, you need to have a destination to evacuate to or you will become just another refugee at an emergency shelter. Thus, the primary purpose of evacuation is to move from a location with unacceptable danger(s) to a location that provides a level of safety.

For our purpose, the Safe Zone is used to give a fixed final location to establish a PRIMARY ROUTE, SECONDARY ROUTE, & TERTIARY ROUTE to, from our primary residence. Primary residence can also include our temporary location we stay at when on vacation or traveling on business trips. I want to also suggest that you can have multiple Safe Zones to be contingencies in the event that your primary Safe Zone gets destroyed by a disaster event or the routes to it become impassable. If you live in a city, it would be wise to determine four Safe Zones outside the city one to the north, east, south, and west. So that no matter where you were in the city when you had to evacuate, you would have a Safe Zone option available to you.

Depending on your needs and available resources, your Safe Zone(s) will be either temporary or permanent. Staying with friends or family, will be a temporary location. An RV lot, vacation home, or secondary residence can be a permanent solution if need be.

Now that we have discussed Mode of Transport, Known Hazards, and Safe Zones, lets move on to Routes. In keeping with a preparedness mindset (https://mtnmanblog.blogspot.com/2014/01/adapt-improvise-overcome-survival.html), to achieve success during a disaster or crisis you need to have options. Options come from pre-planning and rehearsing your plan (followed by a review of successes and areas that need improvements before re-writing and updating your plan.) Just remember planning never ends, it is a process of continuous improvement.

Route options come from conducting a map recce, followed by driving each and every proposed route. Take notes along the Route to identify Known Hazards, Obstacles, and Choke Points. Modify your Route(s) as is appropriate. Create fuel caches along your Route if needed as a contingency. Map your Routes and protect your marked maps. Keep a set of marked maps with your GOOD PLAN.

Determine your PRIMARY, SECONDARY, & TERTIARY ROUTES.

PRIMARY ROUTE: Will usually be the shortest or fastest or simplest Route to your Safe Zone. If you evacuate before the crowds, this is the Route you will most likely use to successfully arrive at your Safe Zone as planned.

SECONDARY ROUTE: In the event you evacuate too late or learn that your PRIMARY ROUTE is not passable, you will elect to use your SECONDARY ROUTE. The SECONDARY ROUTE will not be as fast as the PRIMARY ROUTE; however, the SECONDARY will travel different routes that are more likely to be passable and have less traffic than other routes. Decisions to take the SECONDARY may need to be made while on the fly. In rapidly changing situations staying flexible to using alternate routes may be what saves you and your family.

TERTIARY ROUTE: Either conditions or trigger event or timings may make it necessary to resort to using your TERTIARY ROUTE. The TERTIARY ROUTE is likely the longest, slowest, and most complicated route you have mapped out. This route also will have the highest likelihood of getting you to your Safe Zone in the safest condition.

Be prepared. There is no reason to stop at only mapping three routes to your Safe Zone. The more options you know, the higher the likelihood of successfully reaching your Safe Zone during a disaster or crisis evacuation. Options come from pre-planning and training. Options equal survival.

Whether you are working on your primary GOOD PLAN (https://thegoodplanblog.blogspot.com/2020/04/the-good-plan-now-available-on-amazon.html) or creating a specific annex GOOD PLAN because you are going on vacation or traveling to a new worksite or going to visit Grandma, I hope this discussion helps you create better route plans and consider viable alternates.

Remember, if it can be known, it can be planned for!!

 

VAM